Showing posts with label Driving. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Driving. Show all posts

Raising the Teen Driving Age to 18

Royal Sundaram Health Insurance Review - Raising the Teen Driving Age to 18

Good morning. Today, I learned about Royal Sundaram Health Insurance Review - Raising the Teen Driving Age to 18. Which may be very helpful for me and you. Raising the Teen Driving Age to 18

This article is designed to raise the concern about teen driving fatalities and what can be done to drastically sacrifice this alarming statistic. While this article may be sensitive to some readers in distinct industries, we would like to raise the demand as to what can be done to make our teens better drivers and how to alert others on the road that a new driver is behind the wheel.

What I said. It shouldn't be the conclusion that the real about Royal Sundaram Health Insurance Review. You look at this article for facts about what you want to know is Royal Sundaram Health Insurance Review.

Royal Sundaram Health Insurance Review

Our old article raised the demand of whether the driving age in the country needs to be raised to age 18. With more teen fatalities on the road each year than the estimate of deaths reported from 9/11, we must think changes to our laws governing teen driving. From other perspective one could say that the estimate of teen deaths on the roads in the U.S. Are greater than the estimate of deaths reported of U.S. Soldiers before and after the war in Iraq! Are our roads a war zone?

The National Highway Traffic protection administration reported 3,657 drivers aged 15 to 20 years killed in 2003. In 2002, the estimate killed in the same age range was 3,827. While one would never make light of 9/11, let us think the estimate of energy, government changes, money, war - to name just a few - put forth after 9/11. If only a fraction of this energy had been given to the teen driving problem, possibly we could have reduced teen driving linked deaths in 2002 and 2003 - a imaginable total of 7,484.

Following is a combined statement from
- Gordon Booth, Chief trainer of Drivetrain, Inc. In California, http://www.drivetrainusa.com, and
- Eddie Wren of Drive and Stay Alive in New York, http://www.driveandstayalive.com, with regard to our teen driving problem:
"Research in some countries has shown not only that the younger citizen are when they start to drive the higher the chances of having a serious or fatal crash within the first year of driving, but also that a young person's brain is not fully advanced until after the youthful years have passed, and that this, in turn, also reduces a young person's abilities as a safe driver.

Wisdom and any genuine desire to protect young citizen both undeniably dictate that it is better if teenagers do not start to drive until they are at least 17 or preferably 18 years old.

It is noticeable that if parents can hold back a female for 6 months, so they do not start driving until 17 or 18, then one sees them mature at least 12 months. With males a hold back of about a year equals a maturity growth of about 6 months."

Inexperience, risk taking behavior, and immaturity are cited as customary reasons for these accidents. addition the driving age to 18 would not necessarily change all three customary reasons. Therefore, we must think other potential solutions as well, such as the driving instruction process itself.

Driver instruction Comparison

Comparing our driver instruction process with other countries is an prominent step in exploring potential solutions. Using Germany as an example, we were able to secure the following facts directly from the German driving school online at http://www.fahrschule.de

First you must be at least 18 years of age. After you have completed the driver instruction procedure and school you are on probation for 2 years. while these 2 years a lesser driving violation would need you to re-take the driver instruction course. A more serious driving violation would call for your driver's license to be revoked. In whether case when your driver's license has been granted once again you will be on probation for 4 years. The driver training procedure covers roughly 28 hours of classroom instruction followed by 35 hours of driving school on the road to cover varying conditions of day, night and autobahn perceive with an instructor.

The above only covers a small quantum of the driving laws in Germany. It is evident, however, that the United States does not have these requirements.

How to drive a car?

Teen driver's aside, it is inexpensive to recommend that many adults who have had their driver's license for years are not knowledgeable enough on how to drive a car. They may be traffic regulation experienced, but what about easily using the vehicle? while the driver instruction process we should comprise how to cope a car under different conditions -- road conditions for rain, snow, ice, what to do if you have to slam on the brakes at higher speeds, sudden unexpected responses requiring split second decisions, how to cope the automated and hand-operated transmissions - to name just a few.

This type of training can be performed in driver simulation courses that are currently available from RoadSafety.Com (http://www.roadsafety.com). Larry Selditz, President of RoadSafety.Com had this to tell us:

"For the past 18 months we have been involved in a study and improvement project to bring sufficient vehicle simulation to novice drivers and others. While simulators have been nearby for years, the operative word here is "effective", science-based simulation. We recently completed the study and improvement phase of this project and are now in the process of helping to fabricate a cost sufficient commercially viable simulation product. One of our Vice Presidents, Mr. Fred Craft, is forming a new company utilizing the technology we helped develop. Fred is an industry devotee in advanced vehicle simulation and I believe he would be an ideal perceive for input for your article. I have forwarded a copy of your email to Fred.

I have all the time been a strong advocate of training and believe it is a key component to developing safe driving Skills. That is exactly what a simulator can help achieve. Our vehicle and driver monitoring system, a "black box", is the key to developing safe driving Habits. As my friend Ron Thackery, Vice President of Risk and protection for American healing Response, once told me "what you monitor you can control - what you don't, you won't". That applies to teenagers as well as paramedics. American healing response operates the largest fleet of ambulances in the world and uses our black box to control and heighten driver performance. The same law that have reduced the estimate of ambulance crashes by more than 90% are used in the "black box" we advanced for youthful drivers."

Economic Implications

The customary industries affected by addition the driving age to 18 are the automotive manufacturers, auto insurance, gas and driving instruction companies. This basically covers the largest firms within the auto industry.

The automotive manufacturers would only see a delay in purchases by a factor of three years and only for the first three years that the driving age was raised to 18. Most 18 year olds would receive their driver's licenses while the summer after graduating from high school.

The auto insurance fellowships would hopefully gain revenues by not having to pay out insurance claims due to car accidents created by the 15 - 18 old teens. The National Highway Traffic protection administration indicates roughly 300,000 motor vehicle crashes resulting in injuries for this age group per year, which is above the figures for the fatalities mentioned earlier in this article. Therefore, auto insurance industry would have a gain from raising the age limit and not having to pay out 900,000 claims from car accidents over a three year duration from age 15 to 18.

Gasoline fellowships would see a allowance in their revenues with the allowance of gasoline usage. whether 15 - 18 year old drivers create a essential impact upon the revenues of gasoline fellowships is unsubstantiated as of this writing. However, it would be safe to presuppose some level of allowance would be apparent. The allowance of emissions would easily benefit our planet.

Driving schools would see the most essential impact. Short term they would lose company for the first 3 years. Those three years could be used, however, to help supply them support by both State and Federal governments. The estimate of financial endeavor that has been put forth after 9/11 against terrorist continues to demand if only a fraction could be used in this endeavor to help save our teenagers. while these three years, assisting them to prepare courses should be considered. Long term the driving schools would easily fair better as they would have more hours per pupil to charge.

Affects upon the Family

For parents with new teen drivers with permit licenses going through a state Graduated Driver Licensing (Gdl) program, there will be no work on in the introductory implementation of changing the driving age to 18. Parents with teens that have their operators license and who have allowed their teens to drive on their own will most likely find themselves having to continue to "chauffeur" their 16 - 18 year old teens to their various activities. While costly time would be encumbered, you can get relax from the fact that your teen is still alive, your car is not damaged from an auto crisis and your insurance has not doubled because of a teen driver on the policy.

What if we do not change the driving age?

I have a doctrine that the incompatibility in the middle of utopia and reality is a choice. A option by an private or a group to make a change or move in a different direction. The statistics about teen driving need a change. If changing the driving age to 18 is too big of a leap today, then we can take smaller steps to help teens have better instruction and understand how to drive a car instead of blindly using a deadly weapon.

We need to reveal what the driving schools are asked to teach the students. The requirements need to comprise not only traffic safety, but car driving training under differing conditions. The estimate of hours required behind the wheel should equal the estimate of hours required for the course, which is currently nearby 30 hours. Parents would spend more money to accomplish this, but the further cost is insignificant compared to the lives of their loved ones.

Graduated Driver Licensing (Gdl) should be a requirement nationwide and comprise a probationary duration for all new drivers to last through age 18. Traffic violations while the probationary duration should need re-taking the driver instruction procedure -not with adults that are in a defensive driving course, but with other teens. asking the teen to re-take driver instruction through the same school they received their introductory instruction would be a consideration. Tracking the teens that re-take driver instruction and the driving schools they attend would also help understand if there is a driving school that may not be properly educating the teens.

Driving school vehicles are all the time well marked while students are driving on the main roads. Unfortunately, that requirement does not expand to the house vehicle for new drivers in a Gdl program. All house vehicles with a new teen driver should be required to have at least one label on the back of the car while the teen is driving and through age 18.

Bumper stickers are not all the time practical when a teen is occasionally driving the car and stick-on vinyl to the window does not address night-time driving issues. The technology exists today to use car magnets that are thick, reflective for the night and are durable. These types of car magnets can be found at Auto protection Magnets. Http://www.autosafetymagnets.com Identifying these roughly 2 million vehicles on the road should be a requirement on a national level.

In Conclusion

We hope the above facts was helpful to address the problems, the need, and identify options if the driving age remained status quo or if it were raised. We hope the facts was unabridged to show the economic implications and the hindrances to raising the driving age. With these alarming statistics why have state and federal governments, as well as, the automotive industry jumped to the rescue? Have financial issues while hard economic times been put ahead of our youth? We have to "cowboy-up" to a resolution about this national problem.

I hope you will get new knowledge about Royal Sundaram Health Insurance Review. Where you may put to used in your day-to-day life. And most of all, your reaction is passed about Royal Sundaram Health Insurance Review.

crisis and Cell Phone Driving Statistics in the United States

Accident - crisis and Cell Phone Driving Statistics in the United States

Hi friends. Yesterday, I found out about Accident - crisis and Cell Phone Driving Statistics in the United States. Which could be very helpful to me therefore you. crisis and Cell Phone Driving Statistics in the United States

Humans straight through evolution should continue to keep building good breeds as "Survival of the Fittest," articulate that the weaker counterparts will have fewer chances of reproductions. Any way such theory remains argumentative since a diverse breed of humans makes the world go round. Take for example if all humans are similar in likeness just like you and me, then we will have no talented musicians, no great authors, no captivating engineers or doctors assuming that we are none of the above. The world will categorically be a boring place to live in. Then there are some people who are born to take bold decision while others are risk averse. Some are naturally good at multi-tasking especially the fairer gender yet others are only able to do things one at a time. We may try to keep our survival rate high by holding ourselves out of danger but we are constantly taking on risk and at the same time cannot avoid others from endangering our lives. Take for example cell phone driving or attempting cell phone text messaging while driving. We could accomplish such functions and concept accidents could never happen to us since we have done it countless of times.

What I said. It shouldn't be the actual final outcome that the actual about Accident. You look at this article for information on a person need to know is Accident.

Accident

The findings by Virginia Tech Driving form on July 29, 2009 show that statistics accidents by cars and trucks users, distraction caused by dialing cell phone increases the risk of accident driving incidents by 2.8 times. Distraction caused by cell phone text messaging while driving increases the risk of accidents driving incidents by 23.2 times in comparison to normal driving conditions.

According to the Governors Highway safety connection (Ghsa), as of September 2009, a total of 18 states including District of Columbia have effectively banned all drivers from cell phone text messaging while driving. However, many people are still doing it, taking their chances against the law while endangering themselves and the lives of other road users and pedestrians.

For example, the new regulation under the California agency of Motor car comes into ensue on January 1, 2009 against cell phone text messaging while driving. Similarly, prohibition for using cell phone while driving was effectively in place since July 1st 2009. The California law also denies teens under the age of 18 with valid driving license from using hands-free devices while driving. Whereas, a total ban is enforced for all age group from performing cell phone text messages while driving. Yet, we still find a lot of drivers continue text messaging since they can keep the cell phone out of sight and away from the window. Some drivers will endeavor to accomplish a quick cell phone text messaging while writing materials waiting for traffic light to turn green. The total ban on teenagers under the age of 18 with valid license means they will try to evade the laws by text messaging since they are not allowed to use hand-free while driving. To added complicate the issue, enforcing total ban on cell phone text messaging also mean drivers will all the time be on the look out for enforcement straight through their rear mirror while text messaging, which comes back to the very cause of accidents.

The main imagine for total ban on cell phone text messaging while driving is because drivers will have to constantly take their eyes off the road. Therefore, even if adult age 18 years and above have the freedom of development hands free calls they will still have to keep their eyes off the road when dialing. Headsets and Bluetooth can only minimize our eyes off the road unless every driver start using voice activated self-acting dialing. Realistically, its takes a while searching straight through ones cell phone directories to send a text message. Will this ask for the laws to be enforced on all cellular phone builder that every cell phones must have voice assisted dialing functions! For particular drivers under the age of 18, the imagine for chatting with their friend on cell phone is to keep then awake while driving. Disallowing hands-free for this age group categorically increase the risk of accidents for such drivers. Of course, they are suppose to refrain from driving if they feel tired but not all teenagers abide by the books while some rebellious teenagers take it as challenge against the authority while others are plain ignorant of the laws in place. Perhaps the current laws provided regulations aim to keep cell phone driving or cell phone text messaging accidents to a minimal but this does not fully eliminate risk of highway accidents while driving and using cell phone.

We may be quick in adapting to text messaging or talking on the cell with one hand holding it to the ear but there are numerous risk that does not fall into any regulatory category such as checking on your teeth with the rear view mirror while driving or adjusting your hair and operating car radio to quote a few example.

For anything reasons we need to make calls or text messaging, there are many more reasons that can cause highway accidents while driving. For example holding unrestrained pets in the car which I will discuss in other article, slowing down and holding your eyes on just happen accident, driving under the work on of drugs or alcohol, avoiding road animals, driving beyond speed limit and irresponsible driving to name a few.

I hope you get new knowledge about Accident. Where you'll be able to offer use in your everyday life. And most of all, your reaction is passed about Accident.