Occupy Wall road - What's Next? A Few Wellness Suggestions

Health Insurance Policy - Occupy Wall road - What's Next? A Few Wellness Suggestions

Good morning. Now, I learned about Health Insurance Policy - Occupy Wall road - What's Next? A Few Wellness Suggestions. Which is very helpful in my opinion and also you. Occupy Wall road - What's Next? A Few Wellness Suggestions

Every day, Americans are confronted with stories about and scenes of "Occupy Wall Street" protests in New York City and now other cities in this country and around the world. Most Americans reserve the Occupy Wall road (henceforth Ows) protesters but some on the Right, such as House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), consider the gatherings "mobs." Personally, I find the astounding majority of Ows participants concerned citizens who want to promote fairness.They seek many changes, most on the order of more jobs, greater opportunities and less manipulation by the super rich. You could say they want to level somewhat the playing field.

What I said. It shouldn't be the actual final outcome that the actual about Health Insurance Policy. You look at this article for facts about what you wish to know is Health Insurance Policy.

Health Insurance Policy

The first ask in assessing this phenomenon is this: Does Ows divulge to wellness? If so, how?

What do you think? Do you perceive any connections?

I believe Ows has strong wellness implications. It seems the issues addressed, albeit in uncoordinated, unfocused ways so far, have potential of life consequence for everyone.

Most Ows enthusiasts identify the Republican presidential contenders as friends of the 1 percent-the oligarchs and champions of the affluent and powerful. Ows wants to refocus the national program to advantage the other 99 percent a bit more.

I think the Ows phenomenon is a wellness movement. It has the potential to bring awareness and eventually changes that could boost potential of life for tens of millions. It could do this by speeding changes in many aspects of our economic law within and beyond the Wall road banking focus. Could anyone effectively argue that issues of justice, earnings distribution, equity, fairness and accountability for the current economic turmoil are irrelevant to living well?

A few of the things I like best about Ows so far are:

* Gatherings are non-violent and, though passionate, most participants seem to be enjoying themselves. Who said collective convert advocacy had to be grim? Even police have for the most part behaved well.

* concentration has been taken off the singular issue that paralyzed the Congress recently of how to cut the deficit. The above noted issues deserve at least as much front and town attention.

* Ows demonstrations in St. Petersburg and around the country look and feel nothing like Tea Party gatherings. I authentically like that fact. Maybe I just didn't consideration but I saw no photos of our president with Hitler mustaches, references to witch doctors or a singular racial slur. I authentically did not spot anyone wearing sidearms, brandishing weapons of any kind or warning of Second Amendment remedies for grievances. No buses sponsored by the Koch brothers or other special interest groups arrived loaded with angry retirees with expert signs demanding government off our backs (except, of course, Medicare and collective security programs, which everybody knows are biblically-based devised by Jesus himself). Nor were there network Tv ads (public service announcements) weeks prior to the St. Petersburg event.

* Ows has helped educate the laid-back, non-involved masses. Many are surprised at some of the findings emphasized by protesters, such as the U.S. Decline in average family earnings of 6.7 percent in the last two years, unemployment at 9.1 percent and 46.2 million living in poverty. This is the worse economic accident in half a century. How come everybody is not occupying Wall Street-or the halls of Congress, for that matter?

* Ows started out and remains a leaderless movement for reform that is inclusive and democratic. This is how earlier collective movements that transformed the country began (e.g., the civil possession movement, gay possession movement, women's possession movement, labor movement, peace movement, environmental movement and yuk, even the Tea Party, Kkk and Prohibition movements). Maybe in a few years there will be an Oyl movement-Occupy Your Life for Real wellness movement. This will begin when protesters assemble in collective squares to reserve collective policies that expand reason/science, exuberance/joy, athleticism/planet-friendly diets and liberty/personal freedoms.

They have reminded all of us that we, too, should be engaged in what Paul Krugman called "serious soul-searching, request how much of what he or she thought was true authentically isn't."
So, where does all this go? What can we hope for the best outcomes of the Ows movement? After reflecting on the complexities and concerns raised by the sign carriers and demonstrators, all fervently committed and earnest about their cause, I came up with a few wellness-friendly ideas.

Elect Ows leaders who will take suggestions for definite goals, objectives and strategies for policies that matter most for the nation-and generate definite goals, objectives and strategies. Hopefully, the elected Ows leaders will come up with procedure recommendations on such foundation issues as equal opportunity, greater openness and tolerance, rebuilding the infrastructure, collective education, condition care for all, merciful endings (Aka death with dignity), gun control, disunion of church and state, productive restraints on Wall road and big company and an overhaul of the tax law development it as easy and as progressive as possible.

Replace current financial geniuses such as Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke with progressive thinkers such as Paul Krugman, Joseph Stiglitz, Elizabeth Warren (unless she wins the Massachusetts Senate seat), Ralph Nader or Michael Moore.

Reduce all financial associates thought about too big to fail-and therefore free to plunder away. Matt Taibbi called for the breaking up of all monopolies in Rolling Stone a while ago because they are, among other hazards, "a direct threat to national security." Taibbi noted that there were about twenty such firms in this country that are "more hazardous and unaccountable than a thousand mafias combined."

Raise federal revenues dramatically, focusing on wealthy individuals with more than ten million in assets and large corporations. Place a modest tax on all stock and bond trades.

Require the nationalization of any personal assets in excess of one billion dollars. It's ridiculous that anyone should be able to operate such a ludicrous number of resources, power and influence. Think of it-you take off the power of the Koch Brothers to ruin America with one procedure change. (I'm sure Warren Buffett and most of the other billionaires won't authentically mind.)

Insure that any company that received a Federal bailout makes restitution and refrains from any lobbying until such time as the debt is repaid.

The Ows population have done so much for progressives and for the hundreds of millions who contain the 99 percent, but it may be that they have performed a service for the 1 percent, as well. Jfk's father, Joe Kennedy, a 1 percenter if there ever was one, famously notice that he supported the New Deal because he would gladly give up half of all things he owned to be assured of keeping the other half.

I hope you get new knowledge about Health Insurance Policy. Where you possibly can put to easy use in your daily life. And most significantly, your reaction is passed about Health Insurance Policy.